Some thoughts on Mystery teaching Greek sotry tellers and Ntr

"Gospels were written
to teach the way of Truth and to show us what this Truth consists of,
then the form of parables and enigmatic phrases chosen for this
revelation would be nonsensical if its purpose were to conceal this
Truth. The purpose of these parables and enigmatical phrases is not to
hid anything from ''he who has eyes to see and ears to hear ,"
according to the evangelical formula. The purpose is to select those
who have developed the necessary understanding and who are for this
reason worthy of these 'secrets' (that is to say to not misuse for
selfish motives) There was never any intent to conceal, from those
thus prepared, any of the wisdom transmitted by texts, traditions or
monuments. The enigma does not lie in the thing itself but is the
result of our understanding, our faculties, and our intelligence,
which are not attuned to the mentality according to which the idea was
expresssed and it is just this that our present education prevents us
from admitting."


The Ancients never popularized nything; to the uninitiated they
provided only the miniman uselful teaching. The explanation, the
philosophy, the secret connection between the myth and the sciences
were the perrogative of a handdful of special instructed men. Did not
Pythagoras wait twenty years before being admittend into the Temple?
Did he not, in his own teaching, impose silence on pain of death?
Therefore, this teaching was not written down.

Herodotus often mentions the obligation he was under to remain silent
concerning ''sacred'' subjects. Therefore, the instructions had not
been changed.

Furthermore, the druidical teaching was the privilege fo a priestly
class, guardians fo the most secret oral traditions of a people.

People cling obstinately tothe ''classical'' prejudice and, in order
to defend this theis, perfer to link the ancint Egyptians with the
anthropoids! They would even diminish the value that the Greeks had in
demonstrating the greak Knowlede of ancient Egypt.

Did not the ancient Greeks go study in the sanctuaries of Lower Egypt
as close to the source as possible? They had fewer prejudices then
their modern champions! When Grapow denies the Ancients a knowedge of
the nervs (nervious system) of the circulation of bllod ect ect we can
remind him that Hippocrates, as Iversen recently confirmed (Carlsberg
Papyrus No. 8, 1939) borrowed extensively documents, and did so in
b.c. 450.

I thought you would find this interesting.
But of course this brings us to some interesting conclusions
esp if you read plurtarch and his misinformation....*rolls eyes*
My point being is 1. the fabrication that is the greek historian
(story teller) and
2. They were not reallly alowed to speak of ancient egyptian teachings
even upon pain of death.....

Also keep in mind that Budge was a member of the Golden Dawn Tradition.


The kmt (ancient egyptian) term for symbol is Medu Neter/Metu
Neter...Mdu Ntr....which is translated as hieroglyphs. "Principles
Conveyed by sign" (or signs that bear Ntr)



"wisdom can not vary if it is real."


Ntr (neter / nedjer/ netjer) Is a divine/cosmic or natural principle (
or force)/ spirit. It is like an entire teaching rolled into one
symbol....


the pharaonic mentality is typically indirect. A defined form is used
to evoke an idea of this form -that is to say, the abstract complex
that presides over this defined form."

We become aware -that is to say, we can qualify a thing or an idea -
only by means of comparison. The extreme comparison for Being would be
Non Being . For us a thing exists only because it can, the final
analysis, not be. Now, presence is susceptible to changes; but absence
-nonbeing --is immutable.

the reasoning of absurdity however, underlies any philosophy of Unity
-- that is to say "god'. With in Non-Being of Nature, which comprises
all 'things' is summarized like a seed.... everything that can be.


So Im done with The Temple In Man
by R.A. Schwaller de Lubicz

this is a book written for egyptologists as a paper providing support
to newly descovered (at that time) material regarding ancient egyptian
architecture and beliefs.

It can get very technical and covers Phi, the golden measurement and
the application not only is sacred architecture but in their general
artistic style.

I found it a very good read and enjoyed it thoroughly.